The Internet revolution has allowed for instant mass communication across the globe at virtually no cost. It has altered the way we communicate in a fundamental and significant way, such that letters have been superseded by email, gossip at the water cooler now takes place in online chat rooms and noticeboards have been replaced with online forums and virtual walls. Casual communications that may previously have been in spoken form have shifted to the wider reaching written form such that even idle gossip online has the potential to be extremely damaging to an individual’s reputation. At common law anyone who is involved in the process of the publication of a libel is prima facie liable, a fact that most of the general public do not consider when they write emails, use social networking sites or participate in online forum discussions. Whilst the law must protect members of its society from potential harm public interest demands that this must be balanced against the need to protect our fundamental human rights, such as the freedom of speech. How do courts deal with this need for balance? What legal principles should be borne in mind when dealing with a case involving defamation online?

The Internet revolution has allowed for instant mass communication across the globe at virtually no cost. It has altered the way we communicate in a fundamental and significant way, such that letters have been superseded by email, gossip at the water cooler now takes place in online chat rooms and noticeboards have been replaced with online forums and virtual walls. Casual communications that may previously have been in spoken form have shifted to the wider reaching written form such that even idle gossip online has the potential to be extremely damaging to an individual’s reputation. At common law anyone who is involved in the process of the publication of a libel is prima facie liable. Whilst the law must protect members of its society from potential harm public interest demands that this must be balanced against the need to protect our fundamental human rights, such as the freedom of speech. How do courts deal with this need for balance? What legal principles should be borne in mind when dealing with a case involving defamation online?